Примеры ошибок, обнаруженных с помощью диагностики V532
V532. Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'.
eMule Plus
V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. emule customautocomplete.cpp 277
STDMETHODIMP CCustomAutoComplete::Next(...,
ULONG *pceltFetched)
{
....
if (pceltFetched != NULL)
*pceltFetched++;
....
}
This is what should have been written here: (*pceltFetched)++;
FCEUX
V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. fceux xstring.cpp 444
void splitpath(const char* path, char* drv, char* dir,
char* name, char* ext)
{
const char* end; /* end of processed string */
const char* p; /* search pointer */
const char* s; /* copy pointer */
....
for(s=p; s<end; )
*s++;
....
}
I cannot understand at all what the programmer wanted to do here. This code is equivalent to s = end.
IPP Samples
V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer--' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)--'. aac_enc sbr_enc_frame_gen.c 428
static void
sbrencConflictResolution (..., Ipp32s *nLeftBord)
{
....
*nLeftBord = nBordNext - 1;
....
if (*lenBordNext > 1) {
....
*nLeftBord--;
}
....
}
nLeftBord is used to return the value. This is what should have been written here: (*nLeftBord)--;
IPP Samples
V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. mpeg2_dec umc_mpeg2_dec.cpp 59
static IppStatus mp2_HuffmanTableInitAlloc(Ipp32s *tbl, ...)
{
....
for (i = 0; i < num_tbl; i++) {
*tbl++;
}
....
}
Meaningless code. Currently it is equivalent to tbl += num_tbl.
Apache HTTP Server
V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. apriconv iconv_uc.c 114
apr_status_t
iconv_uc_conv(..., apr_size_t *res)
{
....
if (size)
*res ++;
....
}
This is what should have been written here: (*res)++;
DeSmuME
V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. DeSmuME_VS2005 xstring.cpp 479
void splitpath(const char* path, char* drv, char* dir,
char* name, char* ext)
{
....
for(s=p; s<end; )
*s++;
....
}
Meaningless code. Currently it is equivalent to s = end.
OpenSSL
V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. cpstringutils.cpp 2741
void SkipWhiteSpace(char **ioSrcCharPtr,
const Boolean inStopAtEOL)
{
....
while ((**ioSrcCharPtr == ' ' || **ioSrcCharPtr == '\t') &&
**ioSrcCharPtr != '\r' && **ioSrcCharPtr != '\n')
{
*ioSrcCharPtr++;
}
....
while (**ioSrcCharPtr == ' ' || **ioSrcCharPtr == '\t')
{
*ioSrcCharPtr++;
}
....
}
Similar errors can be found in some other places:
- V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. cpstringutils.cpp 2749
Miranda NG
V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. NimContact namereplacing.cpp 92
int findLine(...., int *positionInOldString)
{
....
*positionInOldString ++;
return (linesInFile - 1);
}
....
}
Godot Engine
V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. trex.c 506
static const TRexChar *trex_matchnode(
...., const TRexChar *str, ....)
{
....
case OP_DOT:
{
*str++;
}
return str;
....
}
Similar errors can be found in some other places:
- V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. trex.c 512
- V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. trex.c 518
- V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. trex.c 524
- And 1 additional diagnostic messages.
Open X-Ray Engine
V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. lwio.c 316
int sgetI1( unsigned char **bp )
{
int i;
if ( flen == FLEN_ERROR ) return 0;
i = **bp;
if ( i > 127 ) i -= 256;
flen += 1;
*bp++;
return i;
}
Similar errors can be found in some other places:
- V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. lwio.c 354
- V532 Consider inspecting the statement of '*pointer++' pattern. Probably meant: '(*pointer)++'. lwob.c 80